Importance of Industrial Design in Wrist-based Wearable Industry

As far as the look is concerned, the wrist-based wearable or watches that proffer heart-rate monitoring aren’t much different from their analog or mechanical counterparts. Undoubtedly, most of these gadgets have similar watch faces, wrist bands, and even the equipment such as the PPG (photoplethysmography) sensor to make the operations like heart-rate measurement possible. These sensors, which rest as an essential component within the wrist-based wearable, often fail to detect the heart-rate appropriately. Nowadays, most of the designers or manufacturers of wearable gadgets suffer from losses due to this concern. If you are also one amongst them, relax as this article has brought a precise solution to this concern. Here, you will become aware of the challenges that these modern devices can face, along with the appropriate way with which you can get rid of the same. Building the wearable with an appropriate Industrial Design is one of the best ways to keep these challenges at bay. Read below to see how.

Challenges

Amongst a lot of challenges that the PPG sensor of wrist-based wearable can face, the most common one is that while activities like jogging, the sensor even senses the changes in the blood volume related to motion take place as the wearable press and deform the blood vessels under the skin. It makes the PPG sensor to create confusions by sensing and mixing up the ratings based on the changes in blood volume and the reflected light intensity. Another factor that compels the PPG sensor to generate ambiguities in heart-rate detection is LED scattering. In the cases of repetitive arm motion due to running or jogging, badly designed wearable creates an air gap amid the photodiode and users’ skin. This air gap leads to scattering, and repetitive scattering can result in degrading the cardiac-associated PPG element from the spectrum. It ultimately turns distinguishing the required cardiac signal into a difficult task.

Measures to Resolve Challenges and Enhance Accuracy of Heart-rate Monitoring in Wrist-based Wearable

Providing wrist-based wearable with the appropriate industrial design is one of the best ways to keep them away from several challenges or glitches. The proper industrial design of your wearable will let you achieve precise heart-rate monitoring outcomes. To understand it better, go through the below example where two spectrograms – one from a poorly designed watch and other from an optimized ID have been observed. The two spectrograms are the outcomes of synchronized accelerometer signals and PPG sensor signals recorded during treadmill running and slow walking. The PPG signal relies on both the motion-related pattern and heart-rate induced pattern, and therefore, the spectrogram of an appropriately designed wrist-based wearable will show a precise spectral density of the accelerometer and PPG sensor as per the optimal industrial design. In this case, the heart-rate frequency is clearly visible, regardless of whether the user is running or walking, and thus, is easily separable from motion frequency. Nevertheless, in the case of wearable designed without focusing on proper industrial design, the spectrogram showcases either faded or invisible heart-rate. Besides, these poorly designed watches, if wore tightly, can stress the blood beds under the user’s skin. It then decreases the blood perfusion and generates difficulty in isolating heart-rate frequency and motion frequency from each other. According to the statistics obtained through this example, designing wrist-based wearable by emphasizing industrial design is imperative. It requires working on several characteristics of ID, some of which are as follows:

1. Optical distance between the photodiode and the LED light source

The distance amid the LED light source and the photodiode is a vital factor that determines signal quality and light-source intensity (battery life). If the gap is short, the photodiode will not receive reflected light from the blood. Nonetheless, if it is large, then the reflected light will turn weak and lower down the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Moreover, increasing the LED current blindly may overfill photodiode’s output, which then fails to provide the information required for heart-rate detection. So there is a need to maintain an appropriate (neither too less nor too much) distance between LED light source and photodiode.

2. Component’s Weight Distribution within Case

Distribution of the components’ weight is a factor essential for reducing the rocking motion of the wearable. As users often prefer watches with scratch-resistant faces, manufacturers’ preference for scratch-resistant glasses is quite high, but the existence of heavy glass on the top covering all other components of the watch exacerbates the rocking motion. Hence, both the component designer and Industrial Designer should work together to evade this top-heavy weight distribution.

Final Thoughts

As per the above information, we can conclude that precise heart-rate monitoring from wrist-worn watches depends not wholly but widely on their industrial design. That’s why it is crucial to emphasize the challenges and approaches to remove them at the ID stage itself. Hopefully, the article has provided you with most of the information that you need in this field. However, if you are still looking for additional info, feel free to contact professionals who deal with rendering services related to Industrial Product Design. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/trademarkmaldives/

Twitter – https://twitter.com/trademarkmaldiv

Linkedin – https://www.linkedin.com/company/trademarkmaldives/

Pinterest – https://in.pinterest.com/trademarkmaldives/

Tumblr – https://trademarkmaldives.tumblr.com/

How Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents Differ?

Intellectual Property Rights

A common question whether Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents are the same or different often hovers over our minds. The main difference between these three common forms of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is that they protect different assets. In today’s competitive era, clear information about copyright, trademark, and patent, and how these differ from each other is essential for protecting your business from infringement issues.

What is Copyright?

Copyright is a type of IP protection that includes the right to secure your original work, including content, images, and everything you put online, on paper, or elsewhere. Copyright encompasses the right to:

  • Reproduce the work,
  • Produce derivative works,
  • Distribute and advertise copies,
  • Represent and perform the work publicly.

Copyright Registration will bestow you with full control over how your assets are made available to others. To ensure complete protection of your copyright, you must register it with the government. Otherwise, you will be unable to sue people or companies for Copyright Infringement.

What is a Trademark?

A trademark refers to a word, symbol, phrase, or logo that recognizes and distinguishes the source of one product or service from others. Trademarks have goodwill associated with the products and services, which further helps the customers in finding their desired products.

Examples of some common trademarks are as follows:

  • Words such as Nike
  • Logos such as the swoosh
  • Slogans such as Just Do It

Apart from giving the ability to sue the unauthorized user, Trademark Protection empowers you to grant permission to others for using your Intellectual Property.

What is a Patent?

A patent is a limited duration IP right that safeguards your inventions by not allowing others to use them.

Patent Law encapsulates:

  • New and useful industrial processes,
  • Machines,
  • Manufactured products,
  • Chemical compositions,
  • Developments in assets.

A patent right gives you the complete authority to prevent others from using or selling your invention. All the responsibilities from implementing the patent law on discovering any infringement to bring the defendant in a lawsuit lie with you.

How Copyrights, Patents, and Trademarks are Different?

i) Assets Protected 

  1. Copyrights protect the original material of the owner, for example – books, images, blogs, etc.
  2. Trademarks secure words, symbols, or phrases that distinguish a company’s assets from others.
  3. Patents ensure the protection of inventions, including processes, manufactures, machines, compositions, and improvements.

ii) Requirements

  1. For attaining Copyright Protection, you should provide original and creative work.
  2. To get your Trademark Application registered, you need to ensure that the mark identifies the source of your product.
  3. While applying for a patent, you should make sure that your invention is new, non-obvious, and valuable.

iii) Terms of Protection

Terms of Protection for intellectual property rights are country-specific. For example, in India:

  1. Copyright rights are valid for the duration, including your (owner’s) life followed by sixty additional years.
  2. Trademark Protection extends for 10 years from the date of application.
  3. Patents last for 20 years.

iv) Rights Granted

  1. Copyrights grant the license to use, disseminate, and publicly display your copyrighted material.
  2. Trademark grants the license to prevent businesses or people from creating confusion because of using marks similar to an already existing trademark.
  3. Patents grant the license to prevent others from using, selling, or importing your invention.

Conclusion

Due to rapid technological advancements, not just the businesses are developing but also the issues like infringement and fraud are increasing. Hence, there is a dire need to protect your intellectual property, which is possible with proper knowledge regarding all types of IP. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com/

Offwhite Sues Virgil Abloh Alleging Trademark Infringement

registered trademark

OffWhite Productions LLC sued Virgil Abloh’s OffWhiteTM for infringing its trademark rights. The New York-based marketing and creative agency claimed that the defendant had hijacked its brand name.

The complaint filed on Sunday in Federal Court includes claims:

  • OffWhite Productions has been operating with its registered trademark since the late ’90s, whereas Abloh launched its Milan-based mark in 2012.
  • OffWhite had maintained a website named as “offwhitedesign.com” since July 2001 and operated a Twitter account with @offwhitedesign.

OffWhite Productions also accused the defendant of continuously applying for new trademarks, encompassing a logo that is “unmistakably similar” to one of its marks.

Besides the above claims, OffWhite Productions alleged the fashion agency saying that the defendant is “steamrolling its path for years by misusing its (OffWhite Productions’) present and past senior and superior rights, and putting a legal, branding, and commercial barricade in the expansion of OffWhite Productions’ business.”

OffWhite Productions claimed that the actions of using the same brand name by Virgil Abloh are creating confusion and hampering its competitive advantage. The plaintiff continued that the advanced Search Engine Optimization (SEO) practices by OffWhiteTM to promote the infringing use of its trademark, along with its celebrity-outreach campaigns and public relations efforts; have displaced offwhitedesign.com (website) from top search results of Google.

Considering all these facts, OffWhite Productions formulated a set of claims including federal trademark infringement, common trademark dilution, and unfair competition. It is also looking forward to seeking monetary damages and stop OffWhiteTM from using any such logo or mark to prevent confusion in the consumer market. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com/